[ Music ] >> Lois Harrell: First was a little girl with some challenges. And the first section was light perception, which she had. She was able to briefly look in on it and follow it, especially after it touched her hand and promoted awareness that it was in her space. At the same time, she has a twin brother whose vision has not presented with problems to his pediatrician. He was able to demonstrate light perception immediately, the ability to track it in all directions; up, down, across, and remember we go across around. The little girl skipped at mid-line, when she went across. He just went right straight across, went down, up, was visually curious enough to stick out his hand and reach. The little girl kind of opened her hand when she knew it was in her space, contacting her hand. He was able to visually do comparative looking with the objective. When it was placed on the table he reached for it. Was able to converge or follow the object end towards his nose, and he was able to follow the object when it was highlighted by the pen light or just present in his space. And the little girl kind of stopped at the point of tracking, just because, "Hmm, this is in my space," but she wasn't seeking information from the object. And, again, the sighted boy goes from left to right, right to left, from up to bottom, from... from all directions. And the little girl was primarily only able to go from across and a little bit up. And unfortunately her head would bop down when things went too long. The little boy alternated gaze between two visual targets. When one was presented he looked, and he initially looked when the noise was made, but he also looked when it was silent. But the noise was because he's a little boy that's interested in things that make noises. The little girl's functional use of vision was seen to fluctuate. His was consistent, and we could count on him being visually curious. Adaptive positioning -- have the feet on a surface because this aligns to a sense of security. In the little girl's case I wish I had positioned her more so that her head was really back on her mother. But she was also interested in falling forward, so it was a challenge. And the mother also indicated that she preferred looking to the right. But her mother was on her left while we were doing this, and she did turn her head to that direction. So she was giving us some information on visual curiosity, or seeking visual security with that. So that was interesting. The little boy didn't seem to bring things close to look for details. He just had a normal space for it. His sister wasn't able to grab. The little boy did not squint when he looked at things. He did not have a light preference for having to have something highlighted to address it. And he just seemed to have normal vision. If the child wears glasses -- which he doesn't and she doesn't, and we didn't use them -- but sometimes putting glasses on a child that has a refractive error or measurement of the eyes that says glasses would make a difference, boy, it's worth every action for the parents to get a pattern going. [ Music ]